HOME/ WINDOWS/ SCREENCAST-O-MATIC REVIEW: WHY YOU’LL FIND IT AS “SCREENPAL” NOW
WINDOWS

Screencast-O-Matic Review: Why You’ll Find It as “ScreenPal” Now

Cross-platform screen recording and editing workspace used for testing ScreenPal
Cross-platform screen recording and editing workspace used for testing ScreenPal

If you go looking for Screencast-O-Matic today, you’ll land on a site called ScreenPal instead — and no, you haven’t been redirected somewhere sketchy. The company rebranded, and it’s worth clearing up before anything else in this review, since a fair number of people searching for the old name assume the product got discontinued.

The short version: Screencast-O-Matic is now ScreenPal — same team, same core product, new name and a broader feature set than the name implied. It combines browser-based and downloadable recording, a genuinely capable editor, and pricing that’s more affordable than most competitors in the “record plus edit” category. If you remember it as a simple screen recorder, it’s grown considerably since.

The rebrand, explained plainly

Screencast-O-Matic launched in 2006 as a straightforward screen recording tool. Over the years the product expanded into video editing, image annotation, and hosting — enough that the original name stopped describing what it actually did. The company rebranded to ScreenPal to reflect that broader scope. Functionally, if you used Screencast-O-Matic before, ScreenPal is that same product, evolved, not a replacement you need to learn from scratch.

What it actually covers

ScreenPal works both as a browser-based recorder (launch and record without installing anything) and a downloadable desktop app, which is a genuine convenience most competitors don’t offer both ways. Recording covers screen, webcam, and audio in combination, with the editor handling trim, annotations, stock media, and basic effects afterward — all in the same product, similar in spirit to Movavi or Camtasia‘s combined approach, but with a lower price floor.

What’s included across the core workflow:

  • Browser-based recording with no install required, or a downloadable app for more control
  • Screen, webcam, and audio capture, individually or combined
  • Built-in editor: trim, annotations, stock image/video library, basic effects
  • Direct publishing to YouTube or ScreenPal’s own hosting

⚠️ What actually breaks:

The free tier caps recordings at 15 minutes, and while that’s generous compared to some competitors, it’s a real ceiling for anything longer — a full webinar recording or an extended tutorial will hit that limit and need the paid tier to continue.

ScreenPal vs. Loom

Both offer the “record and get a shareable result fast” workflow, but they diverge in what happens after recording. Loom optimizes purely for the instant-link, async-communication use case with minimal editing. ScreenPal’s built-in editor is meaningfully more capable — closer to a light video editor than Loom’s trim-only approach — which matters if you’re producing anything beyond a quick team update.

Pricing, current as of this review

Solo plans start around $3/month (billed annually) for the Deluxe tier, scaling up to roughly $10/month for the Max tier with the full editing and hosting feature set. This positions ScreenPal considerably cheaper than Camtasia or Snagit‘s subscription pricing for anyone who mainly needs record-plus-basic-edit rather than the deeper course-creation tools those products offer.

Who it’s actually for

People who want recording and editing in one place, at a lower price than Camtasia or Movavi’s bundles, and who’d benefit from the option to record entirely in-browser without installing anything. Education and training use cases in particular get purpose-built features (flipped classroom tools, quizzes on video) that general recorders don’t offer.

Frequently asked questions

Is Screencast-O-Matic still available, or was it discontinued?
It wasn’t discontinued — it rebranded to ScreenPal. The same company and core product continue under the new name.

Is ScreenPal free to use?
Yes, with a 15-minute recording cap on the free tier. Paid plans start around $3/month (billed annually) and remove that limit.

Is ScreenPal better than Loom?
Different strengths — Loom is faster for pure async video messaging, ScreenPal’s built-in editor is more capable for anyone doing actual post-production on their recordings.

JR

Jordan Reyes — Jordan has spent over eight years testing screen recording and productivity software, and founded this site after too many “best of” lists that clearly hadn’t been tested. Read the full editorial standard →

Related reading: Loom review · Movavi Screen Capture Pro review · Best free screen recorders with no watermark